Sekuris
Permanent staff, not sub chain

Security service without subcontractors — direct liability, not supply-chain risk.

In Greater Erfurt + 40 km radius only Sekuris permanent staff work on your site. No sub construction, no tariff circumvention, no qualification opacity.

  • Direct liability
  • BDSW tariff fidelity
  • §613a takeover on switch

Über 200 Unternehmen vertrauen auf Sekuris — eine Auswahl unserer Auftraggeber:

B2B pain point #1

Why subcontractors are the biggest risk

In B2B evaluation matrices for security services, price transparency ranks first with 30% weight, ahead of operating concept (20%) and staff qualification (15%). What structurally undermines all three factors is the same answer: the subcontractor model. It obscures tariff calculation, qualification evidence and liability lines.

Sekuris therefore committed in the May 2026 strategic shift to working in Greater Erfurt + 40 km radius exclusively with permanent staff. This is not a marketing slogan but a business decision with concrete consequences for margin, staff reserve and contract structure.

6 risks

What subcontractor models cost the client

Six risk dimensions that recur in industry press, BDSW position papers and insurance audits. Each one alone has caused entire mandates to fail expensively.

  1. 01

    Liability rests with the client, not the subcontractor

    On security incidents — theft, personal injury, data breach — the contractual liability sits with the client, not with the subcontractor engaged by the prime provider. The subcontractor is often a thinly-capitalised limited company; if it goes insolvent or its insurer refuses, the client is left with the loss. §823 BGB plus §831 BGB apply directly.

  2. 02

    Tariff circumvention and wage dumping

    Subcontractor constructions are routinely used in the security industry to undercut the BDSW tariff wage. The prime provider charges a market-looking hourly rate but passes only a fraction to the subcontractor — who then pays below tariff. Result: poorly-paid staff with high churn and above-average sickness rates on your site.

  3. 03

    Qualification opacity

    Who actually works on your site? At the third or fourth subcontractor tier this is often no longer traceable. §34a competency certificates, certified industrial security qualification, fire safety watch certification — all promised, none verifiable. On audit, insurer review or claim event the client faces empty file folders.

  4. 04

    High personnel churn, weak site knowledge

    Subcontractor staff often rotates sites every 3–6 months. Building site knowledge, trust with the client's workforce, knowledge of installations and processes — all reset with every rotation. The client pays for re-onboarding without extracting value.

  5. 05

    No continuous shift documentation

    Subcontractors often work with their own incompatible shift tools — Excel sheets, paper logbooks, in-house apps. A continuous incident trend across 12 months is barely producible. Where insurers or audits require incident history, this is an operational gap.

  6. 06

    Industry negative examples

    The security industry has documented cases: persons with extremist ties as stadium security, undeclared work in refugee accommodations, unqualified personnel at major events. Common denominator: opaque subcontractor chains without identity and qualification checks at the client end.

Liability comparison

Who's liable for what — sub model vs. Sekuris permanent employment

Five typical claim scenarios, by contract construction. The legal position is clear — and at most points more disadvantageous for the client in the sub model than in direct permanent employment.

Claim scenarioSub modelSekuris permanent
Theft loss on guarded premisesSub liable — if insurer pays, otherwise clientSekuris liable directly, BDSW standard insurance
Personal injury by security staffClient liable under §831 BGB for vicarious agentsSekuris liable as employer under §831 BGB
Data breach (GDPR violation)Client remains controller under GDPRDPA with clear responsibility allocation
Tariff or minimum-wage violationPrime-contractor liability under AEntG for clientTariff fidelity documented, AEntG risk at Sekuris
Security incident without staff identificationIdentity often unrecoverable (3rd-tier sub)Staff named in mandate contract, complete history

Sekuris commitment

Six concrete consequences of the permanent-staff policy

Six commitments we contractually guarantee and can substantiate in audit cases. More on company structure and security strategy on the Sekuris company page.

  1. 01

    One contracting party, one liability

    You contract with Sekuris. The staff member on your site is a Sekuris permanent employee. On claims we are liable directly — without referral to third parties, without supply-chain insolvency risk.

  2. 02

    Tariff fidelity at every stage

    Sekuris pays BDSW tariff wages without exception. Pay grade is named in the mandate contract; on audit request we deliver anonymised payslips. Below-tariff payment is contractually safeguarded against the client.

  3. 03

    Verifiable qualification

    Per staff member on your site we provide §34a competency certificate, specialised qualifications (industrial security, fire safety watch, crowd management) and the last 12 months of training history. Audit-ready, complete.

  4. 04

    Low churn, high site knowledge

    Sekuris permanent staff stay on the same mandate for an average of 36+ months. Trust with the workforce, knowledge of installations, drilled emergency routines — value subcontractor models cannot structurally deliver.

  5. 05

    One shift software, one data foundation

    All Sekuris staff work with the same shift software, geo-tagged patrol documentation and incident database. Quarterly reports to management, continuous history for insurers and audit, AI-supported trend analysis.

  6. 06

    §613a takeover on mandate switch

    When you switch from another provider to Sekuris, we take over trained staff under §613a German Civil Code as permanent employees — with tariff contract, qualification certificates and shift integration in 4–6 weeks. No onboarding gap.

Frequent questions on subcontractor risks

Answers to the most common questions from B2B initial conversations — particularly from clients considering a switch from a sub provider.

Does Sekuris use subcontractors?
No. Sekuris works in Greater Erfurt + 40 km radius exclusively with our own permanent staff. We reject subcontractor models for three reasons: liability concentration on the client, tariff circumvention in the supply chain and qualification opacity. For mandates outside the service radius (rare) we work only with transparent partner work-contracts, never with concealed subcontractor constructions.
What risks do clients face with subcontractor models?
Six main risks: 1) Direct client liability because the subcontractor is often a thinly-capitalised limited company. 2) Tariff circumvention and wage dumping with AEntG prime-contractor liability risk. 3) Qualification opacity — no traceable §34a evidence per person. 4) High staff churn, weak site knowledge. 5) Inconsistent shift documentation, no continuous incident trend. 6) Reputation risk from documented industry negative examples (undeclared work, unqualified staff).
What is prime-contractor liability under AEntG?
The German Worker Posting Act (§14 AEntG) makes the client liable as prime contractor for minimum-wage violations in the supply chain — even by subcontractors the client did not engage directly. In the security industry with its generally-binding tariff, this means: a tariff violation by a third-tier subcontractor can hit you as client — fines, back-pay obligations, reputational damage.
Can you spot subcontractor use from outside?
Difficult, but indicators exist: staff rotation in three-month cycles, missing uniform branding, varying payslip addresses, the prime provider deflecting detail questions to unreachable third parties, heterogeneous shift tools. Simple test: ask for §34a competency certificates of all deployed persons and pay-grade classification. Clear Sekuris-style answer → no sub. Evasive answer → likely sub construction.
What changes for me when switching from a sub model to Sekuris?
Three things. First: legal clarity — every person on your site has a Sekuris employment contract, is named in the mandate contract, with qualification evidence. Second: staff stability — average tenure 36+ months instead of 3–6. Third: takeover of existing sub staff possible under §613a BGB so onboarding does not start from scratch. Switch mandates fully integrated within 4–6 weeks.
Does that make Sekuris more expensive than subcontractor providers?
On hourly-rate comparison: often seemingly €1–€3 higher. On total cost of ownership: practically always lower — because staff churn, onboarding cost, reputation and liability risks in the sub model are quantifiable costs. For mandates from 12 months duration, Sekuris permanent-staff mandates over 3 years typically run 8–15% below the real total cost of sub models — with measurably higher security depth.
Does Sekuris also serve outside Erfurt without subcontractors?
Within Erfurt + 40 km radius this is our core commitment. Outside this radius we serve mandates rarely and exclusively via transparent partner work-contracts — the partner is named in the mandate contract, qualification and wage conditions are disclosed to the client before mandate start. No concealed sub model, but open partnership.

Switch without onboarding gap. §613a-compliant.

On switching from a sub model to Sekuris, we take over existing staff as permanent employees — tariff contract, training history, shift integration in 4–6 weeks. Let us assess your current setup.